ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Simulation of realistic brain phantoms for susceptibility tensor imaging.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo propose three Susceptibility Tensor Imaging (STI) brain phantoms as ground truth for evaluating STI reconstruction algorithms: two derived from STI data and the one from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI).
methodsThe eigenvalues were generated through a pipeline inspired by the Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Reconstruction Challenge 2.0. An eigendecomposition was applied to an acquired susceptibility tensor, and literature-reported mean eigenvalues were assigned to 13 distinct brain regions. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps provided realistic spatial texture in the eigenvalues. Eigenvectors were obtained from DTI and two STI reconstructions: a Least-Squares algorithm and Diffusion Regularized STI (DRSTI). Microstructural simulations were incorporated into white matter regions. Phantom behavior was tested in three experiments: (i) anisotropic susceptibility assessment using QSM at different orientations; (ii) STI reconstructions across five algorithms with varying orientation numbers; and (iii) reconstructions under different angular rotation ranges.
resultsThe phantoms showed strong contrast in subcortical regions and realistic microstructural patterns. Algorithmic performance trends matched prior reports, with reduced errors as orientation count and rotation range increased. DISCUSSION: Three open-source, in-silico STI brain phantoms were developed and validated as ground truth references for the evaluation of current and future STI reconstruction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.