ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Continuous glucose monitoring and automated insulin dosing systems in clinical routine].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM), connected insulin pens, insulin pumps, and automated insulin delivery (AID) systems enable increasingly data-driven and partially automated diabetes management.
objectiveA practice-oriented evaluation of the indications, clinical benefits, and safety of modern diabetes technologies. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn analysis of current guidelines, position papers, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and selected real-world data. RESULTS AND
conclusionDiabetes technologies should be offered according to individual needs, abilities, preferences, and life circumstances and, when appropriate, implemented early, including at the time of diagnosis. CGM supports diabetes treatment in individuals receiving insulin therapy, those at significant risk of hypoglycemia, and clinical situations in which CGM data improve clinical decision-making. Connected insulin pens facilitate the documentation and combined review of glucose and insulin data. AID systems are preferred for individuals with type 1 diabetes and also represent an effective therapeutic option for those with type 2 diabetes receiving intensive insulin therapy. Regular training, standardized data review, and a back-up plan are required. Patients may continue using their own diabetes devices in the hospital when clinically appropriate and institutional processes are in place. Future developments aim to reduce user burden, improve interoperability, and increase time in range (TIR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.