Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627465›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

The application of excess hazard models for plausible long-term extrapolation in cost-effectiveness: a re-evaluation of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using the KEYNOTE-024 trial.

Kun Kim, Michael Sweeting, Nils Wilking, Linus Jönsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun KimDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. kun.kim@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-3325
Michael SweetingStatistical Innovation, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Nils WilkingDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Linus JönssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic evaluations often rely on immature data to evaluate cost-effectiveness of new treatments. Pembrolizumab was approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression based on interim data from the KEYNOTE-024 trial. Using 5-year follow-up data, we re-evaluated the cost-effectiveness analysis to assess optimal survival models and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

methodsA partitioned survival model was developed from the national payer's perspective. Standard parametric distribution (SPD) models and excess hazard (EH) models were fitted to digitally reconstructed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data from the 11-month interim and 5-year follow-up data from KEYNOTE-024. EH models incorporated general population mortality (GPM) rates to ensure stability and consistency in modelling OS and PFS. Model inputs were primarily derived from the prior assessment by the Swedish Health Technology Assessment agency. Uncertainties around survival models and inputs were examined in probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

resultsWe demonstrated that incorporating the relative survival framework, using EH models, provided a more suitable modelling approach than SPD models when applied to immature survival data from a clinical trial. The SPD exponential models produced overly pessimistic projections, while the SPD log-normal models produced overly optimistic projections. The EH log-normal models without a cure assumption aligned closely with the follow-up data, producing realistic and consistent projections across interim and follow-up data. Scatter plots from the EH models exhibited reduced variability than the SPD models in PSA.

conclusionsModel selection should prioritize realistic survival projections with the use of EH models that incorporate GPM adjustment potentially preferred over SPD models. Models that accommodate waning disease-specific mortality with or without a cure assumption should be considered.

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessExcess hazard modelGeneral population mortalityRelative survival frameworkSurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.