ReviewDrugs & aging2026
Opioids to Treat Chronic Pain in the Older Adult: A Clinical Consensus to Guarantee Safety and Avoid Adverse Events.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pain management in older adults presents unique challenges owing to age-related physiological changes, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and heightened vulnerability to opioid-related adverse effects. This consensus review synthesizes current evidence and expert opinion on the safe and effective use of opioids in older adult patients. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed the literature, addressing the mechanisms of action of opioids, pharmacokinetic characteristics, routes of administration, pharmacology of aging, and distinctions in opioid use for cancer pain versus noncancer pain. Recommendations were developed through iterative consensus. Opioids produce analgesia primarily via μ, κ, δ opioid receptor agonism and nonclassical nociception. The receptor selectivity influences efficacy and side effect profiles. Age-related alterations, such as reduced renal and hepatic clearance, decreased lean body mass, increased body fat, and changes in protein binding, affect absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination, requiring dose adjustments and extended dosing intervals. The choice of route of administration (oral, transdermal, parenteral, epidural) should be based on initial needs, adherence to treatment, gastrointestinal function, and skin integrity. In older adult patients, opioid selection should be carefully considered, giving preference to agents with inactive metabolites or predictable clearance, and with conservative initial doses ("start low, go slow"), regular reassessment and proactive management of side effects, such as constipation, cognitive effects, and fall risk, are essential. For cancer pain, prioritizing potent opioids with transdermal administration for fixed-dose medication and ultrarapid acting fentanyl in pro re nata for the control of sudden pain is usually appropriate. Nevertheless, the target is the multimodal pharmacological treatment; for chronic noncancer pain, greater emphasis on therapy directed at the pathophysiology of pain, risk-benefit assessment, and time-limited use of opioids are strategic actions. Individualized opioid prescriptions in older adults, guided by pharmacologic principles, route-specific considerations, and differentiated approaches for cancer pain versus noncancer pain, optimize analgesia while minimizing harm. Further research should target age-specific dosing algorithms and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.