ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Effect of coupling fluid tonicity on pain and fragmentation outcomes in ESWL: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effects of coupling fluid tonicity on pain, stone fragmentation success and complications in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). This prospective, controlled clinical trial included 294 patients with renal pelvis stones (5-20 mm) allocated to three groups: hypotonic degassed water (n = 97), isotonic 0.9% NaCl (n = 99) and hypertonic 3% NaCl (n = 98). Primary endpoints were post-ESWL Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and stone fragmentation success (< 4 mm residual fragments) on follow-up non-contrast computed tomography at 2-4 weeks. Baseline demographic and stone characteristics were comparable across groups. VAS pain scores differed significantly among the three groups (p = 0.005), with the hypertonic group showing the lowest median score (4.0 vs. 5.0 in both other groups). Post-hoc analysis confirmed that this reduction was statistically significant only between the isotonic and hypertonic groups (Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.004), whereas the difference versus hypotonic water did not remain significant after correction. Multivariable regression confirmed that the pain reduction was independent of the recorded energy level (p < 0.001). Stone fragmentation success rates were similar (56.7%, 59.6% and 57.1%; p = 0.907). The incidence of skin petechiae and/or ecchymosis decreased numerically with increasing tonicity (6.2% to 1.0%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.161). Hypertonic 3% NaCl coupling fluid may significantly reduce ESWL-related pain, particularly compared with isotonic fluid, with no statistically significant difference in clinical stone fragmentation success observed among the groups. Validation through larger, multicentre randomised trials is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.