Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627419›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2026

Physiological and sedative responses in Phrynops geoffroanus (Schweigger, 1812): Comparison of two anesthetic protocols using dexmedetomidine and ketamine.

Ademar Francisco Fagundes Meznerovvicz, Ana Letícia Rodrigues Marques, Marina Marangoni, Ana Paula Gomes Lustosa, Rafael Martins Valadão, Paulo Henrique Braz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ademar Francisco Fagundes MeznerovviczFederal University of Fronteira Sul, Edmundo Gaievski Avenue, 1000, Highway BR 182 - Km 466, PO Box 253, Rural Area, Realeza, Paraná, 85770-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9864-5280
Ana Letícia Rodrigues MarquesFederal University of Fronteira Sul, Edmundo Gaievski Avenue, 1000, Highway BR 182 - Km 466, PO Box 253, Rural Area, Realeza, Paraná, 85770-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1905-9233
Marina MarangoniFederal University of Fronteira Sul, Edmundo Gaievski Avenue, 1000, Highway BR 182 - Km 466, PO Box 253, Rural Area, Realeza, Paraná, 85770-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-6435
Ana Paula Gomes LustosaChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), National Center for Research and Conservation of Reptiles and Amphibians, Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-8637
Rafael Martins ValadãoChico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), National Center for Research and Conservation of Reptiles and Amphibians, Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7029-6631
Paulo Henrique BrazFederal University of Fronteira Sul, Edmundo Gaievski Avenue, 1000, Highway BR 182 - Km 466, PO Box 253, Rural Area, Realeza, Paraná, 85770-000, Brazil. paulo.braz@uffs.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5519-061X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the anesthetic combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in free-ranging Phrynops geoffroanus, assessing cardiopulmonary and sedative variables, as well as pharmacological reversal with atipamezole. Twenty-five adult individuals were allocated into two groups: HG (dexmedetomidine 0.1 mg/kg + ketamine 10 mg/kg; n = 13) and LG (dexmedetomidine 0.05 mg/kg + ketamine 10 mg/kg; n = 12). Heart rate, respiratory rate, and cloacal temperature, along with motor and behavioral reflexes and venous blood gas analysis, were evaluated at baseline, during chemical restraint, and throughout recovery. No significant differences were observed between groups at the same time points for heart rate, respiratory rate, or cloacal temperature, indicating physiological stability at both dosages. In the HG group, respiratory rate progressively decreased from baseline (39 ± 13 [12-64]) to 7 ± 12 [0-42] between 35 and 45 min after drug administration, with recovery to 36 ± 10 [17-56] fifteen minutes following atipamezole administration. Reflex assessment demonstrated deeper sedation in the HG group, with significant differences in head tone, limb tone, righting reflex, and palpebral reflex, whereas cloacal reflex and jaw tone did not differ between doses. Pharmacological reversal restored physiological parameters to near-baseline values within 25 min. Venous blood gas analysis revealed mild and transient changes in pH and pCO₂ in both groups, without clinically relevant consequences. In conclusion, dexmedetomidine at doses of 0.1 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg, combined with ketamine (10 mg/kg) and administered at an ambient temperature of 28 °C, is safe for P. geoffroanus. The higher dose was associated with deeper sedation, making it suitable for field procedures and clinical handling.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineAnimalsBody TemperatureHeart RateImidazolesMaleRespiratory RateatipamezoleDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesImidazolesKetamineCheloniansChemical restraintDissociative anesthesiaSedation

Identifiers

PMID42627419
PMCPMC13498509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.