Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627380›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Prophylactic femoral neck fixation in distal femur fractures: evaluating protection against ipsilateral hip fracture.

Brian D Rust, Daniel E Pereira, David W Barton, Mitchel R Obey, Jenna-Leigh Wilson, Christopher M McAndrew, Marschall B Berkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian D RustDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. brianrustpj@gmail.com.
Daniel E PereiraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
David W BartonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Mitchel R ObeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Jenna-Leigh WilsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher M McAndrewDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Marschall B BerkesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDistal femur fractures occur in older, osteoporotic patients and carry a measurable risk of subsequent ipsilateral hip fracture. Prophylactic femoral neck screw placement is believed by many to mitigate this risk, but clinical evidence is limited. This study evaluates the association between prophylactic femoral neck fixation after distal femur fracture and future ipsilateral hip fracture.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single Level 1 tertiary trauma center between 2018 and 2024. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with AO 33A/B/C fractures and Su type 1-3 periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur fracture treated with operative fixation were included. Patients with pathologic fractures, prior hip arthroplasty, or isolated antegrade intramedullary nailing were excluded. Treatment was classified by the presence or absence of ipsilateral prophylactic femoral neck screw fixation. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of subsequent ipsilateral hip fracture.

resultsOf 395 patients, 163 (41%) received prophylactic femoral neck fixation. The prophylactic screw (PS +) cohort included more female patients (81.0% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.006) and more periprosthetic fractures (65.0% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001). Fixation constructs differed significantly, with nail-plate combinations predominating in the PS + group (69.1% vs 26.4%, p < 0.001). Six patients (1.5%) sustained an ipsilateral hip fracture. No difference was observed in the incidence of ipsilateral hip fracture by prophylactic femoral neck fixation (1.2% vs 1.7%, p = 0.691) or fracture-free survival (p = 0.802).

conclusionProphylactic femoral neck screw placement was not associated with a reduced rate of ipsilateral hip fracture after distal femur ORIF. Hip fractures occurred in both groups, suggesting that screw placement alone may not be independently protective.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesPeriprosthetic FracturesProphylactic Surgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemoral Fractures, DistalHumansMaleMiddle AgedProximal Femoral FracturesRetrospective StudiesDistal femur fractureFemoral neckHip fractureLower extremityProphylactic fixation

Identifiers

PMID42627380
PMCPMC13498633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.