ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Learning from scale-up: a qualitative study of scaling-up interventions for people with multiple long-term conditions in primary care.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScaling innovations for people living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs or multimorbidity) remains challenging, particularly in primary care, where organisational capacity, infrastructure, and local contexts vary widely. There is limited empirical understanding of the implementation work needed to navigate these contextual influences when scaling complex innovations across diverse settings. This study aimed to identify and explain the contextual conditions and adaptive implementation strategies that enabled or constrained scale-up of interventions for people with MLTCs in English primary care.
methodsWe conducted a theory-informed qualitative evaluation of four national projects that aimed to scale evidence-based interventions to improve the care of people with MLTCs in primary care. Projects ran between 2021 and 2024. Data included longitudinal interviews with project teams, document analysis, and a stakeholder workshop. Analysis was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
resultsFour key themes were identified: (1) scaling requires relational infrastructure: relationships, trust, and relational continuity were central to gaining traction; (2) supporting organizations and networks facilitate spread; (3) engaging primary care practices depends on addressing uneven readiness for research and innovation; and (4) local intelligence supports implementation at scale.
conclusionScaling MLTC innovations in primary care is shaped by relational, organisational, and infrastructural factors, including uneven readiness for implementation. Scaling proven interventions requires technical support and investment in the people, relationships, and local infrastructures that support embedding across diverse primary care contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.