ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Base-pair resolution conservation data improves cell type specific sequence-to-expression prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGenomic sequence-to-activity models can decipher gene regulatory mechanisms and predict the functional impact of regulatory variants. However, current models struggle to integrate information from sequences outside promoters, especially information from cell type specific regulatory elements.
resultsHere, we propose incorporating base-pair resolution evolutionary conservation data into genomic sequence-to-expression predictors. We explore two training strategies-training from scratch or fine-tuning an existing sequence-only model with additional conservation input. We find that in both cases, base-pair resolution conservation data improves cell type specific sequence-to-expression prediction, with training from scratch yielding the greatest benefit. The improvement in cell type specific expression prediction can be attributed in part to the fact that models trained on sequence and conservation data learn to better recognize cell type specific regulatory elements than models trained on sequence alone. AVAILABILITY: Code is available at https://github.com/ni-lab/basenji-phyloP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.