ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Navigating the Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Clinical Neurology: A New Multidisciplinary Task Force Within the European Academy of Neurology.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming clinical neurology, offering significant potential to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and disease management. Despite this transformative promise, AI adoption in neurology remains limited due to a lack of a reliable evidence base to support its use, as well as educational, ethical, methodological, and regulatory barriers. Furthermore, currently, there is no standardized educational framework for the application of AI in clinical neurology across Europe.
methodsTo address this gap, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) has established a dedicated multidisciplinary Task Force (TF) on AI in Clinical Neurology. This TF involves neurologists, neurology trainees, medical students, computer and data scientists, ethicists, patient representatives, and regulatory experts.
resultsThe AI TF has designed a modular curriculum covering technical AI foundations and models, clinical applications, ethical implications, and regulatory compliance. Planned educational resources include e-learning modules, podcasts, masterclasses, and interactive sessions at EAN congresses. Also, a recently conducted Europe-wide survey supported the TF in identifying current knowledge levels and educational and systemic barriers, informing the design of targeted interventions. In parallel, the TF will formulate recommendations addressing the ethical and regulatory implications of AI use in neurology, tailored to the specific needs of clinicians.
conclusionsThe EAN TF on AI in Clinical Neurology represents a strategic initiative to enable responsible AI integration through multidisciplinary collaboration. By closing educational gaps, establishing clear ethical standards, and facilitating stakeholder engagement, the TF aims to empower neurologists to confidently and ethically adopt AI technologies, ultimately improving patient care across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.