Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627284›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Treatment Initiation of Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

Lin-Feng Guo, Li-Mei Lin, Zhen-Zhen Lu, Zhi-Cong Hong, San-Gang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin-Feng GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Li-Mei LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Zhen LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Cong HongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
San-Gang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-2614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the relationship between time to treatment initiation (TTI) of definitive radiotherapy and survival outcomes in locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC).MethodsWe retrospectively included patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The multivariate regression analysis, recursive partition analysis, penalized spline function, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used for statistical analyses.ResultsA total of 18657 patients were included. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: no delay (<36 days), at risk of delay (36-61 days), and delay (>61 days). Compared to patients who initiated radiotherapy within 61 days, patients who initiated radiotherapy after 61 days had a higher risk of death in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) (no delay vs. at risk of delay vs. delay: 58.7% vs. 60.5% vs. 50.5%) (P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (no delay vs. at risk of delay vs. delay: 47.7% vs. 49.5% vs. 39.4%) (P<0.001). Patients in the delay group had worse outcomes in CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.209; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.143-1.278; P<0.001) and OS (HR, 1.199; 95% CI, 1.146-1.256; P<0.001). In patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, the risk of death progressively rose as the treatment was delayed. However, there was no significant difference in the risk among patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.ConclusionsFor patients with LAHNC, delay of definitive radiotherapy leads to inferior survival. Our study highlights that the threshold of 36 and 61 days significantly affects survival and identifies patients experiencing these delays.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsTime-to-TreatmentAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramTreatment Delaydelayhead and neck cancerprognosisradiotherapytime to treatment initiation

Identifiers

PMID42627284
PMCPMC13498790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.