ArticleJournal of vision2026
Probabilistic tuning of attentional templates: Evidence for flexible prioritization in visual working memory.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attentional templates in visual working memory (VWM) are essential for guiding visual search. Although much debate has focused on whether these templates are stored in discrete states or continuous resources, a question remains: To what extent can the priority of a template be strategically tuned to match environmental probabilities? We investigated this flexibility by manipulating the reliability of retro-cues (the probability that a cued item is the target) across three experiments combining memory recall and visual search. Crucially, we tested whether strategic prioritization persists under varying memory loads (two vs. three items). We observed that retro-cue validity affected both search efficiency and memory performance and that these effects were larger under higher cue reliability. This reliability-dependent pattern was clearly present when memory load increased to three items (Experiment 2) and was also observed when item shape signaled the functional role of each representation (Experiment 3). Together, these results show that the influence of a cued representation varies systematically with cue reliability. This pattern is consistent with flexible prioritization but does not distinguish between a continuous adjustment of template strength and probabilistic switching between discrete representational states. Overall, our findings suggest that VWM prioritization is sensitive to expected relevance and adapts to memory load and task structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.