ArticlemBio2026
Why are archaea not pathogenic? A hypothesis based on metabolism-habitat covariation.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathogenicity, the ability to cause infectious diseases in multicellular eukaryotes, is widespread among bacteria and eukaryotes but has not been reliably identified in archaea. To explore possible reasons for this disparity, we perform comparative analyses of thousands of bacterial and archaeal isolates. Our results show that isolated bacterial pathogens possess the ability to use organic compounds as sources of energy, electrons, and carbon (chemo-organo-heterotrophy or COH), suggesting that COH is a metabolic prerequisite for pathogenicity. Moreover, we find that isolated archaea capable of COH do not inhabit multicellular eukaryotes and instead predominantly inhabit extreme environments that preclude such eukaryotes. In contrast, all isolated archaea that inhabit multicellular eukaryotes are incapable of COH metabolism. This metabolism-habitat covariation in isolated archaea, together with COH as a potential prerequisite for pathogenicity in bacteria, suggests that the absence of archaeal pathogens may be due to a combination of the two factors: COH-capable archaea lack the environmental opportunity to inhabit multicellular eukaryotes, while non-COH archaea lack the metabolic prerequisite for pathogenicity.IMPORTANCEPathogenicity-the ability to cause infectious disease-is widespread among bacteria and eukaryotes but conspicuously absent from archaea, the third domain of life. To understand why archaea are non-pathogenic, we performed comparative analyses of thousands of bacterial and archaeal isolates. We found that the absence of pathogenic archaea can be explained by a combination of metabolic and environmental factors. Specifically, archaea living within eukaryotic, multicellular hosts lack a metabolic capability correlated with pathogenicity-chemo-organo-heterotrophy-whereas those possessing this metabolism typically live under extreme conditions, such as high temperature, and therefore lack the environmental opportunity to interact with eukaryotic hosts. These findings advance our understanding of microbes by revealing important links between their metabolism, habitats, and pathogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.