ArticleSICOT-J2026
Sequential Workflow for Integrated Biological Repair in Combined Four-Graft Knee Reconstruction.
Article in SICOT-J, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe a structured technical-conceptual workflow for comprehensive biological knee reconstruction, focusing on the coordinated integration of four independent allografts - femoral osteochondral, tibial osteochondral, meniscal, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) - performed in a single operative setting.
backgroundMulticompartmental failure involving bipolar osteochondral defects, meniscal deficiency, and ligamentous instability represents one of the most challenging scenarios in joint preservation surgery. Although individual reconstructive techniques are well documented, current literature lacks a widely accepted consensus regarding their simultaneous execution. In this context, three-dimensional preoperative planning and structured sequencing logic are critical for preventing tunnel convergence and preserving the biological viability of the grafts. Methodological Framework Description: A structured reconstructive strategy is proposed to optimize surgical exposure and avoid spatial conflicts and graft interference. The workflow begins with a systematic arthroscopic mapping followed by a wide arthrotomy, adhering to a "surface restoration-to-stabilization" logic, consisting of: (1) customized femoral osteochondral shell allograft transplantation; (2) tibial osteochondral transplantation using a cylindrical plug technique; (3) medial meniscal allograft transplantation with dovetail bone fixation; and (4) anatomic ACL reconstruction using a soft tissue tendon allograft. This specific sequencing allows stabilizing elements to be adapted to the already restored articular anatomy, minimizing tunnel convergence and protecting soft-tissue grafts from aggressive osseous surgical maneuvers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This technical-conceptual work provides a structured roadmap to support surgical decision-making in highly complex reconstructive cases. By systematizing operative sequencing and the management of technical interferences, the proposed workflow enables a reproducible biological reconstruction strategy aimed at restoring articular homeostasis in young and active patients within a single surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.