ReviewInternational journal of oncology2026
Post‑translational modification‑governed immune states in cancer immunity: Biomarker implications for checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and immunotherapy resistance (Review).
Review in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune escape and therapeutic resistance remain major obstacles to durable benefit from cancer immunotherapy, yet transcript‑based or abundance‑based biomarkers often fail to capture the regulatory states that determine effective immune control. Post‑translational modifications (PTMs) form a dynamic protein‑state layer that rapidly reshapes protein stability, trafficking, complex assembly, and signaling persistence under tumor‑intrinsic and therapy‑imposed stress. In the present review, a biomarker‑oriented framework is proposed in which PTM biology is interpreted through three recurrent immune constraints: Checkpoint competence, tumor visibility and stress‑conditioned immune‑state programming. Within this framework, programmed death‑ligand 1 is viewed as a protein‑state biomarker problem rather than a static expression marker; tumor visibility is defined by durable antigen‑presentation competence and interferon‑linked reinforcement; and stress‑driven immune dysfunction is interpreted through metabolite‑sensitive PTM rewiring and chromatin‑coupled suppressive stabilization. Rather than cataloguing PTMs comprehensively in cancer immunity, the present review focuses on five core exemplar PTM axes, glycosylation, palmitoylation, ubiquitin editing, phosphorylation and lactylation, because they repeatedly map to rate‑limiting immune constraints, are supported by mechanistic evidence, and represent candidate assay‑compatible or intervention‑relevant state variables at differing levels of translational maturity. It is further outlined how integrated proteogenomic, immuno‑peptidomic, and spatial datasets can be used to discover candidate PTM‑state biomarkers, validate mechanism‑proximal readouts in prespecified pretreatment and on‑treatment settings, and prioritize single or co‑dominant state constraints for patient stratification, pharmacodynamic monitoring, and rational combination design. By organizing PTM biology around measurable state variables rather than modification class alone, the present review provides a phase‑aware translational framework for candidate biomarker discovery, fit‑for‑purpose validation, constraint‑guided stratification, and therapeutic prioritization in cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.