Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627069›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2026

[Corrigendum] Sulforaphane reduces molecular response to hypoxia in ovarian tumor cells independently of their resistance to chemotherapy.

Michal Pastorek, Veronika Simko, Martina Takacova, Monika Barathova, Maria Bartosova, Luba Hunakova, Olga Sedlakova, Sona Hudecova, Olga Krizanova, Franck Dequiedt and 2 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michal PastorekLaboratory of Tumor Immunology, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Veronika SimkoInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Martina TakacovaInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Monika BarathovaInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Maria BartosovaInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Luba HunakovaLaboratory of Tumor Immunology, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Olga SedlakovaInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Sona HudecovaInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Olga KrizanovaInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Franck DequiedtLaboratory of Protein Signaling and Interactions, Interdisciplinary Cluster for Applied Genoproteomics, University of Liège, Sart-Tilman, Belgium.
Silvia PastorekovaInstitute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Jan SedlakLaboratory of Tumor Immunology, Cancer Research Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 833 91 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the Editor's attention that the β‑actin control protein band featured in the right‑hand lane of Fig. 1A on p. 54 appeared to be strikingly similar to the β‑actin control protein band featured in the right‑hand lane of Fig. 2B on the same page, albeit after vertical flipping and with possible horizontal and vertical resizing. Owing to the lack of availability of the raw western blot data due to the time that has elapsed since this paper was published, the authors have repeated the experiments and provided new western blots for these figures, which fully confirm the veracity of the findings presented in the originally published study. The revised versions of Figs. 1 and 2 are shown on the next page. In response to an additional query, the authors also wished to point out that the raw data from the PCR analysis (which were presented to the Editorial Office for inspection) confirmed that the data were correctly assembled from the original electropherograms, and that the part of Fig. 4C associated with the A2780/ADR cells was composed of two parts that came from the same experiment and the same run. They were put together as such, simply because they were loaded in two separate parts of the gel. The authors thank the Editor of

Indexed as

carbonic anhydrase IXchemoresistancehypoxiamigrationsulforaphane

Identifiers

PMID42627069
PMCPMC13553189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.