Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626991›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Experiences and Lessons Learned Implementing Abortion Services at an Australian Sexual and Reproductive Health Service: A Mixed-Methods Study Using Normalisation Process Theory.

Gianna M L Robbers, Yen Li Lim, Yan Cheng, Emmalee A Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gianna M L RobbersThe Research Centre, Family Planning Australia, Newington, NSW, Australia.
Yen Li LimThe Research Centre, Family Planning Australia, Newington, NSW, Australia.
Yan ChengSchool of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emmalee A FordThe Research Centre, Family Planning Australia, Newington, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-2399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionAbortion has been decriminalised in New South Wales, Australia since 2019. Post-decriminalisation, non-government organisation Family Planning Australia commenced abortion services. This study used Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to examine the implementation of abortion services at five clinic sites.MethodsA convergent mixed methods study was conducted with >50% of staff and 43 clients during the implementation period. Quantitative data was described using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed deductively using NPT constructs, with data within each domain examined to identify patterns, similarities and differences across participants. Data were integrated and synthesised narratively to align with NPT.ResultsAbortion care was conceptualised by staff as an important service addition. More than a third of staff surveyed increased in that belief post-implementation, some staff also reported a diminished scope of practice. 92% of clients rated their care as very good or excellent. Staff reported challenges implementing the service, which occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time and logistical constraints negatively impacted the implementation. Staff debriefing opportunities and client access to social workers had a positive influence.ConclusionsKey drivers of implementation were identified as shared staff values regarding abortion, and high client satisfaction. We make recommendations for new implementation or ongoing improvement of abortion services delivered in primary care contexts.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedFamily Planning ServicesReproductive Health ServicesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCOVID-19FemaleHumansNew South WalesPatient SatisfactionPregnancyQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2abortionevaluation frameworkhealth servicesprimary caretermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42626991
PMCPMC13498834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.