ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Innovative Emerging Technologies for Pulse Flour Functionalization: A Comparison With Conventional Thermal and Biological Techniques.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulse flours, such as those from peas, beans, and chickpeas, are highly valued for their nutritional density, making them essential for meeting the rising global demand for plant-based and gluten-free foods. Despite these nutritional advantages, industrial use is limited by specific sensorial, nutritional, and technological constraints. Overcoming these challenges requires targeted functionalization strategies designed to impart improved and predictable techno-functional properties. This review describes the characteristics of pulse flours and assesses both conventional (thermal, biological, and chemical) and innovative modification techniques, with particular emphasis on the application of nonthermal technologies and the main techno-functional aspects. Thermal methods are the most studied, primarily inducing starch gelatinization and protein denaturation, generally improving water- and oil-holding capacities but often reducing foaming and emulsifying properties. In contrast, biological methods (germination and fermentation) generally have a positive effect on aroma and typically lower pasting viscosity. Interestingly, the application of innovative nonthermal technologies is understudied in pulse flour matrices, although substantial research has been carried out on the main isolated components (starches, proteins, and fibers). The basic working principles of each technology and the available studies applying them to pulses are discussed, focusing on both static and dynamic high-pressure processing, ultrasound, cold plasma, and pulsed electric fields. The selection of the optimal functionalization approach must be based not only on an understanding of the underlying mechanism but also on a clear view of the intended final application to ensure the desired ingredient performance and economic feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.