SynthesisJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Diagnostic performance of panfungal PCR on tissue specimens for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Fungal PCR Initiative (FPCRI).
Synthesis in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal diseases are difficult to diagnose because of the limited sensitivity of culture. Panfungal PCR amplicon sequencing assays (targeting ribosomal RNA, such as 18S, 28S, ITS) are recommended for fungal identification in histopathology samples showing fungal elements. However, data describing its overall performance and consistency are lacking. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis assessed the performance of panfungal PCR on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and non-fixed (fresh or frozen) tissue samples. A systematic literature search was performed to include studies reporting the use of panfungal PCR for fungal identification in FFPE or non-fixed tissue samples. PCR sensitivity and specificity were assessed using the reference standard of histopathology showing fungal elements. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty-eight studies were included. In FFPE samples (18 studies, 852 samples), sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.2-86.6) and 93.5% (70.2-98.9), respectively. Sensitivity in non-fixed samples (13 studies, 207 samples) was 86.5% (74.7-93.3), while specificity could not be assessed (insufficient data). Comparative analyses showed a significantly higher sensitivity of panfungal PCR over culture (88.2%; 76-94.7 vs 52.2%; 39-65, IMPORTANCE: Invasive fungal diseases are difficult to diagnose because of the low sensitivity of culture. Panfungal PCRs are widely used for fungal identification in tissue specimens but suffer from heterogeneous procedures and performance. This meta-analysis shows an acceptable sensitivity (75.4% and 86.5% in fixed and non-fixed samples, respectively) and good specificity (93.5%) of panfungal PCR, supporting its use, not only on histopathology-positive fixed samples but also in non-fixed samples concomitantly with other diagnostic tools (cultures and fungal-specific PCRs if available). These results provide a strong basis for further standardization of panfungal PCR techniques via interlaboratory assays to assess reproducibility and optimize analytical protocols. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with PROSPERO as CRD42023461148.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.