ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Psychometric Properties of an Arabic Translation of the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes About Sleep Scale (DBAS-16) in a Sample of University Students.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development and maintenance of sleep habits are significantly influenced by dysfunctional attitudes and perspectives about sleep. There is a paucity of research on sleep issues in Arab environments, which is probably due to a lack of validated and culturally appropriate assessment instruments. An Arabic version of the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16) will be psychometrically validated in this study using a sample of college students.
methodsA total of 670 university students (mean age = 20.38 ± 1.97 years; 59.1% female) participated in a cross-sectional study. To ensure semantic equivalency between the original and Arabic forms, the DBAS-16 scale was translated and modified for use in the current study. The translation team made sure to carefully balance the literal and cultural distinctions. To identify and correct any discrepancies, the original and translated English versions were thoroughly compared. Composite reliability was assessed using McDonald's and Cronbach's α, with values greater than 0.70 reflecting adequate composite reliability. Concurrent validity was examined via correlations with psychological distress (PHQ-4).
resultsThe four-factor and the second order models demonstrated acceptable fit. Measurement invariance was supported at all levels across genders, with no significant difference in DBAS-16 scores between males and females. Higher DBAS-16 total scores were significantly, albeit modestly, associated with higher psychological distress (PHQ-4), providing evidence of concurrent validity.
conclusionThe Arabic translation of the DBAS-16 demonstrated a factor structure similar to the original scale, with acceptable internal consistency, reliability, and measurement invariance across genders. The Arabic DBAS-16 may be useful in both research and clinical settings for assessing dysfunctional sleep beliefs in Arabic speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.