Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626731›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2026

Identifying and Comparing Communication Challenges Between Nurses and Resident Physicians.

Anh Nguyen, Ho-Man Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anh NguyenLewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Ho-Man YeungLewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective healthcare delivery involves coordinated communication between healthcare team members. Objective: This study compares challenges in communication between nurses and residents. Methods: This is a single-centered survey study in which 58 Nurses and 54 Internal Medicine residents at Temple University Hospital anonymously completed a 14-item questionnaire between August 2023 and March, 2024. Results: Approximately 42% (54/128) residents participated. When assessing overall satisfaction, residents expressed lower satisfaction compared to nurses (57% vs 86%; p < 0.001). Additionally, residents find nursing documentation less helpful than nurses do vice versa (5% vs 74%; p < 0.0001). Residents more often than nurses ask the other for clarifications (85% vs 65%; p < 0.05). Interesting, 67% of nurses reported care delays due to inadequate coordination while 100% of residents reported delays (p < 0.0001). Residents reported greater difficulties in reaching the correct nurse than nurses in reaching the correct resident (91% vs 53%; p < 0.0001) and they also encountered both higher frustration and confusion in communication (93% vs 63%; p < 0.001 and 74% vs 52%; p < 0.05, respectively). Residents are also more likely to perceive nurses as not understanding the plan of the day (81% vs 63%; p < 0.05). On the other hand, both felt respected and heard (p = 0.10; p = 0.49) and satisfied with overall coordination and responsiveness (p = 0.32; p = 0.34). The study highlights notable challenges between nurses and residents, such as documentation and coordination. Free responses provided insight into barriers preventing effective communications and are categorized into "Responsiveness", "System-based", "Directedness", and "Respect". Conclusion: Future research should focus on addressing these differences to foster better teamwork and understanding.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealthcare teamNursesPhysiciansResidents

Identifiers

PMID42626731
PMCPMC13493006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.