Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626729›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2026

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Retrosigmoid Craniotomy with Layered Suboccipital Muscle Dissection to Prevent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and Infection.

Mahak Sipani, Vikas Vazhayil, Harsh Deora, Madhusudhan Nagesh, Kiyoshi Saito, Nishanth Sadashiva, Kavin Devani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahak SipaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vikas VazhayilDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Harsh DeoraDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3247-1117
Madhusudhan NageshDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kiyoshi SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Rosai Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Nishanth SadashivaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0509-4993
Kavin DevaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Numerous modifications to the retrosigmoid craniotomy (RSC) have been reported, including variations in skin incision, soft tissue dissection, craniotomy, and closure techniques. This study aims to demonstrate a modified suboccipital muscle dissection technique for RSC with a detailed anatomical description and to assess its effectiveness in minimizing postoperative wound complications. Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2024, 140 consecutive retrosigmoid craniotomies performed at our institute using the standardized layered muscle dissection technique were included. All these cases were retrospectively reviewed for wound-related complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, pseudomeningocele, and infection, requiring surgical intervention, as well as postoperative headache, including occipital neuralgia requiring medications. Results: The cohort included 63 males and 77 females, with vestibular schwannoma being the most common diagnosis (73.5%). A total of 92 patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt before the definitive surgery. The tailored muscle dissection approach was applied uniformly in all the cases. Duroplasty was done in all cases, using pericranial grafts if needed, and in five cases, bone was not replaced due to intraoperative brain bulge. The mean follow-up duration was 40 months. Wound complications occurred in five patients (3.5%): two developed pseudomeningocoele, and three had CSF leak with infection. No patient required additional medication for postoperative surgical site-specific pain. Cosmetic results were favorable, with no wound contracture or muscle atrophy. Conclusion: Understanding and respecting anatomical muscle layers during suboccipital dissection significantly reduce wound-related complications and postoperative morbidity. This sharp dissection technique with minimal coagulation is safe, reproducible, and practical, offering functional and cosmetic benefits.

Indexed as

CSF leakoccipital neuralgiaretrosigmoid craniotomy (RSC)suboccipital dissection

Identifiers

PMID42626729
PMCPMC13493167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.