Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626714›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026

Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Flow-Directed Microcatheter Tip Markers.

Yuya Sakakura, Kenichi Kono, Takeshi Fujimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuya SakakuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi KonoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Showa Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takeshi FujimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Saito Memorial Hospital, Minamiuonuma, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Flow-directed microcatheters (FDMs) offer high flexibility and trackability for accessing distal arterial feeders. However, the radiopaque tip marker is small, making it difficult to identify on fluoroscopy. This study evaluated an intraoperative artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for real-time detection of FDM tip markers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive cases of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma using the AI-based system. The detection rate was evaluated on a frame-by-frame basis during microcatheter placement. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed based on the catheter diameter (1.5 Fr vs. 1.3 Fr) and whether the microcatheter tip or guidewire tip advanced ahead during navigation. Results: Twenty-five FDM placement scenes were analyzed. Mean microcatheter navigation time was 2.1 min. The precision, recall, and detection rate of the system were 95%, 51%, and 50%, respectively; the detection rate was calculated as the proportion of true-positive frames among all analyzed frames. Although this was an exploratory subgroup analysis, the detection rate appeared higher for the 1.5-Fr microcatheters than that for the 1.3-Fr microcatheters (78% vs. 46%; p = 0.006). Furthermore, the detection rate was significantly higher when the microcatheter tip advanced ahead of the guidewire tip than vice versa (65% vs. 43%; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Although the detection rate was 50%, the AI system may help operators recognize the tip position when it becomes difficult to identify on fluoroscopy. Larger multicenter studies are required to validate these findings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedevice trackingflow-directed microcatheters

Identifiers

PMID42626714
PMCPMC13493196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.