ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Flow-Directed Microcatheter Tip Markers.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Flow-directed microcatheters (FDMs) offer high flexibility and trackability for accessing distal arterial feeders. However, the radiopaque tip marker is small, making it difficult to identify on fluoroscopy. This study evaluated an intraoperative artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for real-time detection of FDM tip markers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive cases of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma using the AI-based system. The detection rate was evaluated on a frame-by-frame basis during microcatheter placement. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed based on the catheter diameter (1.5 Fr vs. 1.3 Fr) and whether the microcatheter tip or guidewire tip advanced ahead during navigation. Results: Twenty-five FDM placement scenes were analyzed. Mean microcatheter navigation time was 2.1 min. The precision, recall, and detection rate of the system were 95%, 51%, and 50%, respectively; the detection rate was calculated as the proportion of true-positive frames among all analyzed frames. Although this was an exploratory subgroup analysis, the detection rate appeared higher for the 1.5-Fr microcatheters than that for the 1.3-Fr microcatheters (78% vs. 46%; p = 0.006). Furthermore, the detection rate was significantly higher when the microcatheter tip advanced ahead of the guidewire tip than vice versa (65% vs. 43%; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Although the detection rate was 50%, the AI system may help operators recognize the tip position when it becomes difficult to identify on fluoroscopy. Larger multicenter studies are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.