ArticleCureus2026
Intraoperative Discovery of an Unintentionally Retained Abdominal Drain Fragment Incorporated Into the Small Bowel During Elective Colostomy Reversal: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retained surgical items are extremely rare but significant critical complications of abdominal surgery. These complications are usually associated with considerable morbidity and medicolegal implications. Among these, retained surgical drains are especially uncommon and often underreported. We present a case of an incidental intraoperative discovery of a retained abdominal drain fragment during elective colostomy reversal. Here, we present the case of a 40-year-old male who underwent elective reversal of a sigmoid loop colostomy, which had been created 10 months earlier following a penetrating abdominal stab injury. The patient remained asymptomatic during the interim period, with no clinical or radiological suspicion of intra-abdominal pathology. During surgery, dense adhesions were encountered, and a retained fragment of an abdominal drain kit was identified embedded within a fibrous tract. Further exploration revealed a 2 × 1 cm ileal perforation, which had been effectively sealed by the incorporated drain segment, preventing peritoneal contamination. The drain had also eroded proximally into the jejunum and distally into the anterior abdominal wall. The foreign body was carefully removed, the perforation was repaired, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery. Unlike previously reported cases of retained surgical drains, which typically present with infection, obstruction, or fistula within weeks to months of retention, this case is notable for a 10-month asymptomatic interval, attributable to the drain fragment's dual role in both causing and simultaneously sealing the bowel perforation. This case highlights an unusual presentation in which a retained drain fragment appeared to function as a biological seal over the perforation site, likely accounting for the prolonged asymptomatic course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.