ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026
Self-as-doer and health promotion for patients with chronic disease.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review aims to investigate the role of the self-as-doer construct, a psychological determinant gaining recognition for explaining and sustaining health-promoting behaviors, in health promotion among patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the role of self-as-doer construct in health promotion among patients with chronic diseases. Following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for English-language publications up to June 2025. The search strategy utilized keyword combinations, such as "self-as-doer," "doer identity," "agentic identity," "self-identity," "health behavior," "lifestyle behavior," "self-care behavior," and "behavioral health." Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed, empirical (quantitative or qualitative) and published in English, and explicitly examined the self-as-doer concept in relation to health behaviors. Conversely, non-peer-reviewed publications, theoretical articles without original data, and studies outside the health context were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies and performed thematic analysis. Of the 157 records initially identified, four studies met the final inclusion criteria. These included an intervention trial (Brouwer and Mosack, 2015) with 124 women focusing on diet; a cross-sectional survey of 330 diabetes patients (Brouwer and Mosack, 2012) examining self-care behaviors; an experimental study (Brouwer, 2020) with 220 university students on physical activity; and a cross-sectional instrument-validation study (Brouwer and Mosack, 2013) focused on diabetes management. The findings were categorized into three main thematic areas: diet, self-care, and physical activity. Findings suggest that a strong self-as-doer identity is positively associated with engagement in health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic illnesses. Nonetheless, several limitations were evident across the literature, including the small number of available studies, limited sample diversity, and short follow-up periods. Due to the nascent nature of the "self-as-doer" concept within health fields, the literature on this topic is limited yet growing. Strengthening the self-as-doer identity appears to enhance intrinsic motivation and adherence to health-promoting behaviors. At the policy level, embedding this psychological approach into public health strategies and campaigns could improve long-term health outcomes at both the individual and community levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.