Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626681›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026

Nursing students' perceptions of the usefulness of educational research: Qualitative thematic analysis.

Alejandro Hernández Díaz, Verónica Díaz Quezada, Monica Illesca Pretty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro Hernández DíazDepartamento de Procesos Diagnóstico y Evaluación, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Catolica de Temuco, Chile.
Verónica Díaz QuezadaEducativa IESED-CHILE, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile.
Monica Illesca PrettyDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Oficina de Educación en Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrating research into the nursing education process stimulates critical thinking and research skills, promoting a more solid understanding of the discipline. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study explored nursing students' perceptions of the usefulness of research in their training process. Fourth-year students were involved in two focus groups (six members each), conducted between November and December 2024. Data were analyzed manually using Braun and Clarke's thematic technique. Methodological rigor criteria were applied, and the study was approved by the program's ethics committee.

resultsThematic analysis identified three main categories: (1) Useful research tools, (2) Development of research skills, and (3) Recommendations for strengthening educational research.

conclusionsThe findings show that formative research is perceived by care management as a valuable resource for integrating theory and practice, as well as for developing key research skills in nursing students. The main skills acquired include critical thinking, scientific writing, and systematic searching, all of which are fundamental to evidence-based professional practice. However, areas for improvement are mentioned in relation to both methodological training for teachers and institutional commitment to academic publication. This suggests the need for policies and strategies that consolidate research as a cross-cutting theme in nursing education, as it enriches disciplinary knowledge and fosters a virtuous cycle of learning that enables innovation in the profession.

Indexed as

Critical thinkingnursing studentperceptionprofessional trainingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42626681
PMCPMC13492866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.