ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
The effect of
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudents' learning outcomes on hydrocarbon compound material are often suboptimal due to low interest and lack of active participation in the learning process. Innovations, such as the use of educational game media, offer an alternative to improve conceptual understanding. This study is a quasi-experimental research aimed at determining the effect of MATERIALS AND
methodsThis research is a quasi-experiment using a posttest only control group design. The population consists of grade XI MIPA students at SMA Negeri 4 Maros, totaling seven classes. Sampling was conducted randomly, selecting class XI MIPA 5 as the experimental group and XI MIPA 6 as the control group. These classes were chosen because students at this level begin to study more complex chemistry topics, such as hydrocarbon compounds.
resultsDescriptive analysis showed that the average learning outcomes of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group. Inferential statistical analysis was then conducted, preceded by normality and homogeneity tests. The results confirmed that data from both groups came from homogeneous populations.
conclusionBased on the data analysis, the null hypothesis (H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.