Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626627›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026

Twelve tips for using educational data mining and machine learning to predict performance in high-stakes health professions education exams.

Haniye Mastour, Raheleh Ghouchan Nezhad Noor Nia, Saeid Eslami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haniye MastourSchool of Medical Education and Learning Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Raheleh Ghouchan Nezhad Noor NiaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeid EslamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and educational data mining in health professions education is poised to revolutionize high-stakes examination performance prediction. This study provides a practical guide with 12 essential tips to enhance predictive accuracy, offering actionable insights for educators, stakeholders, and policymakers. Key focus areas include assembling interdisciplinary teams, effective data collection and preprocessing, selecting appropriate AI models, ensuring methodological rigor, and implementing robust validation practices. The guide also addresses data accessibility, ethical considerations, and model interpretability. By leveraging AI-driven techniques like neural networks, decision trees, and ensemble learning, educators can make data-informed decisions to improve educational outcomes. Grounded in real-world examples, this resource equips health professions educators, data scientists, and policymakers with the strategies to develop ethically sound and effective models, ultimately contributing to student success and improving healthcare quality.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceeducational data mininghealth professions educationhigh-stakes examsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42626627
PMCPMC13492837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.