Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626603›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2026

From Germline Variants to Tumor Outcome: GWAS-Based Functional Genomics Prioritizes Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility Genes and Links

Chengguang Hu, Guang Yang, Han Xiong, Yetong Xie, Zhao Yuan, Jiani Liu, Peiying Wang, Meng Li, Jiabao Xu, Qingyun Li and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chengguang HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1484-6854
Guang YangDepartment of General Surgery, Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China, gzhmc.edu.cn.
Han XiongDepartment of Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Yetong XieThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Zhao YuanThe second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, China, glmc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8795-163X
Jiani LiuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0756-0373
Peiying WangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Meng LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-5142
Jiabao XuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7907-8885
Qingyun LiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Chulan LiThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Wenlin HanThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Xin PengDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.
Li ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Jiuquan Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital (Jiuquan People's Hospital), Jiuquan, China.
Shanshan CaiDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK, lancs.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0594-0953
Fei ZhongDepartment of Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4993-9234
Lin DaiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, fimmu.com.
Side LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, fimmu.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-988X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 200 germline risk loci for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the causal variants and genes behind most GWAS signals remain unknown and the link between inherited risk and tumor outcome is largely unexplored. Connecting germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to gene expression through expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and to clinical outcome is needed to interpret this inherited risk. Methods: We combined CRC GWAS summary data (73,149 cases and 112,467 controls of European ancestry) with GTEx v8 eQTL from colon sigmoid, colon transverse, small intestine terminal ileum, and whole blood, integrating causal transcriptome-wide association study (cTWAS) with SuSiE fine-mapping, Bayesian colocalization, MAGMA SNP-to-gene analysis, and AlphaGenome variant-effect prediction. Prioritized proteins were assessed by western blot. Four experimentally selected regulatory variants were genotyped in HCT116, SW480, RKO, and NCM460 cells; genotype-protein associations were tested across cell-line means, and cis-regulatory effects were assessed by allele-specific expression (ASE) and reference-versus-alternate dual-luciferase assays. Prognostic relevance was evaluated in TCGA colorectal tumors. Results: cTWAS identified seven genes with posterior inclusion probability (PIP) > 0.50, and colocalization across 78 gene-tissue pairs revealed 20 associations with PP.H4 > 0.80. Four genes showed convergent evidence: SMAD9 (PIP = 0.916, PP.H4 = 0.981), MAP3K2 (PIP = 0.762, PP.H4 = 0.827), FADS1 (PIP = 0.632, PP.H4 = 0.942), and ACTR1B (PIP = 0.566, PP.H4 = 0.994). All four proteins were reduced in CRC cells. Alt-allele dosage was inversely associated with SMAD9 (Pearson r = -0.985, BH-adjusted Conclusions: Integrating statistical genetics, regulatory prediction, and locus-directed experiments prioritized SMAD9, MAP3K2, FADS1, and ACTR1B as CRC susceptibility genes. Functional evidence was strongest and most directionally coherent for SMAD9, demonstrated allele-specific but context-dependent regulation at FADS1, and placed experimental bounds on the proposed MAP3K2 and ACTR1B mechanisms.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGerm-Line MutationDelta-5 Fatty Acid DesaturaseGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisQuantitative Trait LociDelta-5 Fatty Acid DesaturaseFADS1 protein, humanAlphaGenomecausal transcriptome-wide association studycolorectal cancerexpression quantitative trait locus (eQTL)genome-wide association study (GWAS)germline variantssingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID42626603
PMCPMC13492055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.