ArticleACS omega2026
A Leakage-Aware Benchmark Study of Machine Learning Models for Deep Eutectic Solvent Property Prediction.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the physicochemical properties of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) remains challenging due to the large combinatorial design space and the complex, composition- and temperature-dependent interactions governing their behavior. While machine learning (ML) has been widely applied to DES property prediction, reported performance is often sensitive to data set structure, feature representation, and validation design, raising questions about the reliability and transferability of existing models. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of descriptor-based ML models for DES property prediction using a curated and high-confidence data set spanning 2003-2026. A unified feature representation combining molecular descriptors, molar composition, and temperature is employed, and model performance is assessed under a hierarchy of validation protocols designed to control for data leakage and progressively increase extrapolation difficulty. The results show that predictive performance is strongly dependent on the validation design. Density and refractive index exhibit relatively stable behavior, while surface tension shows moderate predictability. In contrast, electrical conductivity and viscosity display a strong dependence on temperature and limited contribution from descriptor-based features. Under extrapolative validation, performance for these properties deteriorates substantially, indicating limited transferability. Additional analyses based on feature-space distance and similarity-based baselines indicate that prediction errors are strongly associated with training-domain proximity and that local similarity in the current feature space is insufficient for reliable prediction outside observed data regions. These findings suggest that the primary limitation arises from the representational capacity of static descriptor-based features rather than model choice alone. Overall, this study provides a structured and reproducible assessment of the conditions under which descriptor-based ML models can be expected to succeed or fail in DES systems and highlights the importance of rigorous, leakage-aware evaluation in data-driven chemical modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.