Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626517›Full record

ReviewConservation physiology2026

Physiology and the future of animals in shifting-sand deserts: living, moving and thermoregulating in the sand.

Duncan Mitchell, Mary K Seely, Shane K Maloney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duncan MitchellDepartment of Physiology, Brain Function Research Group, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, 7 York Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-4773
Mary K Seely55 Libertina Amathila Avenue, Swakopmund, Namibia.
Shane K MaloneyDepartment of Physiology, Brain Function Research Group, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, 7 York Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-2266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation of the animals of the shifting-sand deserts requires a thorough understanding of the physiological mechanisms that not only enable them to function in the desert, but also may buffer them against future change. The animals there contend with little water and poor food resources. The animals of shifting-sand deserts also must move on and in loose sand and cannot construct unsupported burrows. Most are invertebrates, but the deserts also are home to many vertebrate species, mainly lizards. We describe the biomechanics of their locomotion on and in the sand. Some are quiescent buriers that remain near the surface, but remarkably, small desert mammals can swim to depths of more than 500 mm. Diurnally active animals retreat into the sand beneath their feet to avoid overheating in summer and freezing in winter, but burial and emergence are not determined by selection of the best thermal or hygric environment. We address the conundrum of why so many species that are active in the sun are black. The sand provides a fortress that resists invasion, but from which the residents cannot escape. The animals are under threat from climate change and from human use and abuse of the shifting-sand deserts, even though the sand is unsuitable for concrete. We argue that efforts to combat desertification do not absolve us from a need to conserve shifting-sand deserts. In a companion review, we discuss how the physiology of breathing, the acquisition of metabolic energy and the management of body water impacts the conservation of the animals of shifting-sand deserts.

Indexed as

Beetleburrowcolddesertificationheatlizardmolesand-swimming

Identifiers

PMID42626517
PMCPMC13491554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.