Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626512›Full record

ReviewConservation physiology2026

Physiology and the future of animals in shifting-sand deserts: respiration, energetics and water balance.

Duncan Mitchell, Mary K Seely, Shane K Maloney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duncan MitchellBrain Function Research Group, Department of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, 7 York Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-4773
Mary K Seely55 Libertina Amathila Avenue, Swakopmund, Namibia.
Shane K MaloneyBrain Function Research Group, Department of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, 7 York Road, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The many invertebrates and reptiles of the shifting-sand deserts, and their rare mammals, live in and on the sand. Their conservation requires a thorough understanding of the physiological mechanisms that not only enable them to function, but that may buffer them against future change. The almost-spherical shape of the aeolian sand grains of shifting-sand deserts enables gas diffusion from the surface to maintain a normoxic environment deep in the sand, with sufficient volume to sustain sand-swimming animals, even the mammals. In the resource-poor desert landscapes, cellulose is the dominant source of metabolic energy for herbivores, much of it contained in detritus that can originate hundreds of kilometres from the desert. Carnivores and omnivores consume mainly detritivores, with termites often contributing substantially to their diets. Many animals of shifting-sand deserts manage their body water by the acquisition of metabolic and preformed water, balanced against limited loss of body water via integument, excreta and respiration. Those that do drink usually use droplets from fog or dew. Some small invertebrates extract water vapour from unsaturated air. The animals have evolved mechanisms to counteract osmotic shock when they consume pure water that can constitute more than 40% of body mass in a single drink. In a companion review, we discuss how the animals move and how they cope with potentially lethal desert heat and cold in and on the sand. We need to conserve their fortresses in the sand, and, anomalously, it is food, not water, that requires attention.

Indexed as

Beetlecellulosedesertificationdetritusdewfoglizardmoleoxygensand-swimming

Identifiers

PMID42626512
PMCPMC13491553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.