SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Artificial intelligence learning environments and educational psychology (2016-2025): a systematic bibliometric synthesis and review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) into educational environments has fundamentally transformed instructional design building upon earlier AI research in educational psychology. However, there is growing concern that computational innovation is outstripping pedagogical and psychological coherence. To evaluate the intersection of AI learning environments and educational psychology, this study provides a systematic bibliometric synthesis of peer-reviewed scholarship published between 2016 and 2025. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we employed a dualpronged approach, applying multiple descriptive and analytical modeling techniques to analyze a synthetic corpus of 34 systematic review papers and an empirical corpus of 1,376 original research articles. Longitudinal results reveal an unprecedented "generative turn" and a shift in methodological maturity, moving from exploratory computational modeling to rigorous experimental and quantitative validation. Despite these advancements, our analysis identifies a persistent "theoretical gap." While the synthetic literature advocates for deep psychological grounding, empirical studies remain overwhelmingly anchored in surface-level motivational outcomes, failing to adequately operationalize complex constructs such as metacognition, epistemic beliefs, and self-regulated learning (SRL), just to name a few. We conclude that for AI to foster effective, equitable instruction and learning, it must transcend being a mere content delivery mechanism and instead function as a "psychological catalyst." By prioritizing human-centric architectures, cognitive scaffolding, identity, and critical AI literacy, this synthesis provides a structural roadmap for stakeholders to align rapid technological strides with the foundational science of learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.