ArticleIranian journal of child neurology2026
From Genes to Function: Clinical Experience with the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
Article in Iranian journal of child neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) involves the survival motor neuron (SMN) 1 gene, leading to motor neuron degeneration. SMN2 is a homologous gene to SMN1, which can produce SMN protein at lower levels. The new gene-based drugs modify SMN2 pre-messenger RNA splicing, leading to production of functional SMN protein. Materials & Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Risdiplam and Nusinersen in patients with SMA types I-III. Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE) was used for motor evaluation. Results: Results revealed that changes were significant after six months (p< 0.001). Improvements were compared between the two drugs, age groups, and SMA disease types, and no significant differences were found. No severe side effects were experienced and only a few patients reported headaches, and backaches following Nusinersen. Conclusion: both Risdiplam and Nusinersen led to significant improvements in motor function; however, based on cost-effectiveness considerations, we recommend Risdiplam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.