ArticleACS omega2026
AI-Driven Workflow for Automated Colorimetric Isothermal Amplification for Robust Pathogen Detection on Portable Devices.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point-of-Care (POC) portable devices have shown significant potential for rapid pathogen identification in limited-resource settings. Colorimetric LAMP (cLAMP)-based POC nucleic acid testing is particularly promising due to its speed, sensitivity, and simple visual readout. However, there is a need for a universal, automated color detection method to improve ease of use and reduce readout subjectivity using portable devices. We proposed an AI-driven workflow for automatic detection of multiple pathogens using cLAMP in a multitube strip format. Following sample extraction, reagent rehydration, and reaction incubation, the cLAMP panel was photographed with a portable device. The algorithm performed: (1) image preprocessing to locate tubes; (2) segmentation and cleaning to extract the liquid-filled region using deep learning and Otsu's binarization, followed by pixel cleaning; (3) empty tube and invalid control checks; and (4) color detection using relative Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD; a nonparametric statistical distance between the hue distributions of two tube images) to identify samples. The AI workflow was evaluated on 1,636 photos from 527 tests for the differential diagnosis of three panels, for skin-tropic viruses, respiratory viral pathogens, and malaria parasites, under various lighting conditions in POC environments. The AI workflow was compared to expert-adjudicated human visual readouts as the reference standard. Rejection of invalid photos, defined as panels containing empty tubes or failed controls, achieved 98.94%, 98.29%, and 96.68% accuracy (95% CI 97.83-99.57%, 96.97-99.15%, 94.13-98.33%) for the three panels, respectively. Misclassified images were caused by human mistakes or extreme lighting conditions. Color identification on accepted images achieved 99.97%, 100%, and 99.69% accuracy (95% CI 99.82-100% for Data set 1 and 98.27-99.99% for Data set 3; one-sided 95% lower bound 99.90% for Data set 2). This study demonstrates a reliable automatic color readout workflow for cLAMP-based nucleic acid detection, showing potential for integration into POC testing apps for cloud-based use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.