ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Vector Surveillance in Malaria Risk Areas in 2025.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Vector surveillance is the cornerstone of malaria prevention and control. This study evaluated malaria vector density and Methods: From April to October 2025, mosquitoes were collected from 87 surveillance sites. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, in collaboration with local governments and the Ministry of National Defense, calculated the Trap Index (TI; number of collected individuals/number of traps/collection days). Molecular analyses were performed to detect Results: The cumulative malaria vector TI in 2025 (82.0) decreased by 32.0% compared to 2024, primarily because lower temperatures in April delayed the seasonal peak in vector abundance. The highest proportions of malaria vectors were observed in Gyeonggi Province (36.3%), followed by Gangwon Province (18.8%) and Incheon Metropolitan City (16.9%). Molecular analysis identified four Conclusions: Vector surveillance remains a fundamental component of malaria elimination efforts. These findings provide evidence to support the malaria advisory and warning system and offer valuable data for future vector surveillance and malaria control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.