ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Circulating neuron-derived cfDNA for blood-based detection of Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative conditions.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases are improving early detection and staging, but current assays primarily reflect aggregate neuropathology or generalized neuronal injury and do not resolve the specific neuronal populations affected. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) retains stable DNA methylation patterns reflective of tissue and cellular origin, making it a promising substrate for cell-of-origin analysis. However, conventional methylation approaches are limited by bisulfite-associated DNA damage and amplification-related bias, hindering the detection of neuron-derived cfDNA, a small fraction of total circulating cfDNA. Here, we present proof-of-concept evidence that native nanopore sequencing can support both brain methylation atlas generation and downstream cfDNA cell-of-origin classifier development in neurodegenerative disease. By directly profiling endogenous DNA methylation without bisulfite conversion or PCR amplification, nanopore sequencing preserves native molecules, reduces processing-related bias, and enables flexible, genome-wide methylation profiling that can be iteratively expanded as additional reference cell types are incorporated. Using whole-genome native nanopore sequencing, we generated a methylation reference atlas from six primary human neural cell populations-cortical neurons, dopaminergic neurons, spinal motor neurons, astrocytes, Schwann cells, and microglia-and developed cell-type-informed cfDNA classifiers. Classifier performance was assessed in silico using dilution series designed to model physiologic admixture. The framework was then applied to 137 blood plasma samples from individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and healthy controls. Elevated circulating cfDNA fragments exhibited methylation patterns similar to reference profiles from selectively vulnerable neuronal populations, including cortical neuron-like signatures in AD and progressive MCI, dopaminergic neuron-like signatures in PD, and spinal motor neuron-like signatures in ALS. Multivariate integration of neuronal signatures improved the separation of diagnostic groups within this cohort (AUC > 0.85). Although the reported atlas is limited and additional validation in larger and independent cohorts will be required, these results support the feasibility of native cfDNA nanopore methylation sequencing as a flexible platform for brain-derived cfDNA analysis and more cell-type-informed investigation of neurodegeneration from peripheral blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.