ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Collaborative Outreach in Ecology Through Social and Natural Science Partnerships in the Classroom.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecologists increasingly work in multi-disciplinary projects with communities, land managers, and policy makers to translate ecological knowledge into on-the-ground action, yet graduate training rarely provides structured practice in the cross-disciplinary collaboration that this work demands. We present a case study of a project-based graduate seminar co-taught by an ecologist and a social scientist that paired eight social science master's students (Emory University) with two ecology doctoral students (San Diego State University and University of California, Davis) in a semester-long, largely remote collaboration. Student teams used a research proposal as a boundary object to co-produce socially-informed ecological research designs, supported by readings and staged feedback, mid-semester cross-team discussion, and final presentations. The collaboration yielded two applied proposals: (1) an assessment framework for an elementary, place-based science program using pre/post "sticker" surveys, observation, and stakeholder interviews/focus groups; and (2) a mixed-methods study of how US restoration researchers and practitioners' goals and decision-making are shifting, including openness to using ecosystem function targets versus historic species composition. Student reflections highlighted several friction points, including translation across disciplinary language, differing methodological instincts and epistemic norms, and virtual coordination constraints, but also reported meaningful gains in mutual respect, clearer communication, and a more realistic understanding of the labor required to collaborate well. We synthesize these lessons into practical recommendations for course design, including early cross-training, frequent structured touchpoints, iterative co-generation of questions and methods, and balanced instructor presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.