ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2026
Was Kraepelin Prescient Regarding Excitation-Inhibition Imbalance in Schizophrenia?
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on schizophrenia increasingly highlights altered excitation-inhibition regulation in cortical circuits. Excitatory Glutamatergic pyramidal cells propagate activity, whereas inhibitory Gamma Amino Butyric Acid (GABA) interneurons periodically inhibit this activity. Their interaction supports gamma synchronization and the integration of information, while dysfunctional glutamatergic transmission (especially at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA]-receptor) disrupts information flow. This framework invites a restricted reconsideration of Kraepelin's concept of dementia praecox. While Kraepelin erred in proposing a uniform, deteriorating course (schizophrenia is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental spectrum disorder and many patients remain stable or recover) his emphasis on an early disturbance of mental integration in schizophrenia may have been prescient. In schizophrenia, cognitive differences often precede psychosis, while genetic, experimental, postmortem, electrophysiological, and pharmacological findings converge on aberrations in the ecosystem of the NMDA-receptor in schizophrenic patients and members of high-risk groups for schizophrenia. D-serine, glycine, kynurenic acid, and redox state are important co-regulators of the NMDA receptor and constitute possible therapeutic targets. Negative trials of D-serine and glycine-transporter inhibitors, however, challenge simple augmentation strategies while leaving the developmental circuit hypothesis open, which would call for much earlier interventions. We argue that the decisive test for this hypothesis are biomarker-defined studies near illness onset; precisely when gamma synchronization or mismatch negativity already indicates impaired coordination. Excitation-inhibition imbalance thus gives Kraepelin's clinical observation a modern and experimentally tractable form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.