ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
The Pet-Specific Reasons for Living Scale: development, validation, and associations with suicide-related outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Companion animals may represent salient reasons for living, yet existing measures do not assess pet-related commitments. This study developed and validated the Pet-Specific Reasons for Living Scale (Pet-RFL) and examined its associations with mental health and suicidality. Method: Data were drawn from 962 U.S. adults completing an online survey. Sixteen Pet-RFL items, modeled on the Reasons for Living Inventory, were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis in a random subsample and confirmatory factor analysis in the full sample. Measurement invariance was tested across sociodemographic groups. Construct validity was examined via associations between each Pet-RFL factor score and depression, anxiety, stress, suicidal ideation, lifetime suicide attempt history, social support, and RFL domains. Results: A two-factor structure was supported, reflecting pet-related belongingness/responsibility and harm-avoidant obligation/concern. Both factors demonstrated excellent internal consistency and strong measurement invariance. Adjusting for covariates, higher belongingness/responsibility scores were associated with lower suicidal ideation, fewer depressive and stress symptoms, reduced odds of lifetime suicide attempt history, and greater survival/coping beliefs and moral objections as measured by the RFL. In contrast, when adjusting for covariates, higher harm-avoidant obligation/concern scores were associated with greater suicidal ideation, more depressive and stress symptoms, higher likelihood of lifetime suicide attempt history, and greater responsibility to family and fear of suicide and lower moral objections as measured by the RFL. Conclusion: The Pet-RFL is a psychometrically supported measure capturing distinct pet-related reasons for living with differing associations to suicidality. Further, this study preliminarily distinguishes between belonging-based and harm-avoidant reasons for living related to companion animal relationships, highlighting the complex roles companion animals may play in human wellbeing, multispecies caregiving, suicidality, and veterinary social work practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.