ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026
Translation of the strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls questionnaire into Hindi.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia is common among cancer patients and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The strength, assistance in walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire is a simple screening tool for evaluating sarcopenia; however, no validated Hindi version is currently available for use in Indian oncology practice.
aimTo translate and culturally adapt the SARC-F questionnaire into Hindi and assess its reliability and content validity.
methodsThis single-center cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center in India. The questionnaire was translated using forward-backward translation following World Health Organization and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines. Pilot testing assessed clarity and cultural relevance. Adult Hindi-speaking cancer patients completed the finalized questionnaire. Reliability and content validity were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and content validity indices, and descriptive statistics with Pearson correlation analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 100 patients were included (mean age 50.9 ± 12.6 years; 63% female). The Hindi SARC-F demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.70). Content validity was excellent, with a scale-level content validity index of 0.92 and item-level indices ranging from 0.80 to 1.00. The median SARC-F score was 1 (interquartile range 0-3). No statistically significant correlations were observed between SARC-F scores and age, performance status, or body composition parameters (all
conclusionThe Hindi SARC-F is linguistically valid, culturally appropriate, and suitable for functional sarcopenia screening in Hindi-speaking cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.