Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626327›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Variation in medical claim denials: safety-net providers are hardest hit.

Gabe G Weinreb, Bruce E Landon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabe G WeinrebHealth Policy and Management, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163, United States.
Bruce E LandonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4912-0647

Funding

Tradeoffs in the Design of Public Long-Term Care BenefitsP01AG032952 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Bruce E. Landon · 2009 to 2026
$39.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG032952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medical claim denials impose substantial costs on providers but may also reduce low-value care, resulting in lower expenditures and better quality. Little is known about how denial rates vary across payer and provider segments, including for safety-net providers. Methods: Using a large, multipayer claims dataset from 2019, we examined initial denials, appeal patterns, and final denials by payer segment, service type, and provider safety-net status. Results: Medicaid managed care had the highest initial denial rate for professional claims (15.1%), while Medicare Advantage had the highest rates for inpatient (20.0%) and outpatient (16.5%) claims. Safety-net providers faced uniformly higher initial denial rates than nonsafety-net providers across professional (13.6% vs 9.2%), inpatient (18.3% vs 14.7%), and outpatient (13.3% vs 12.9%) services. Conclusion: Safety-net providers absorbed a disproportionate share of denial costs. These providers' lack of negotiating leverage to secure favorable terms with payers could be 1 driver of these disparities, as could higher rates of low-value care delivery. A standardized framework for the terms and conditions governing payer-provider contracts could help ensure all claims are decided based on the same set of rules.

Indexed as

claim denialsequityinsurancemanaged caremedicaidmedicare advantagereimbursementsafety-net provider

Identifiers

PMID42626327
PMCPMC13492083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.