ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
SCAI/ASE/HRS/SIR/SVS Expert Consensus Statement on Enhanced Radiation Protection: Time for Mandatory and Urgent Action.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health care professionals in fluoroscopic laboratories face significant occupational hazards, including cancer, cataracts, and reproductive concerns due to prolonged exposure to iodizing radiation, and orthopedic injuries stemming from long-term use of heavy aprons as protection from radiation. Despite substantial advancements in radiation protection technology, adoption of these advancements has been slow, hindered by the high upfront costs of implementation and the lag in revising institutional and regulatory radiation exposure thresholds to reflect the capabilities of contemporary enhanced radiation protection devices (ERPDs). This multisociety statement, endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, American College of Cardiology, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Society of Interventional Radiology, and the Society for Vascular Surgery, calls for mandatory implementation of ERPDs to meet as low as reasonably achievable standards. This expert consensus statement outlines the ethical and legal responsibilities of government, fluoroscopy laboratory manufacturers, and health care institutions to protect all health care professionals from avoidable workplace hazards and the urgent need to implement ERPDs. The document does not promote or recommend any single ERPD system, and the choice of protection technology is left to department preference. It also addresses the importance of training, monitoring, and continuous research to optimize radiation safety practices. The document advocates for updated regulations and standardized practices across states to ensure comprehensive protection for all fluoroscopy laboratory personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.