ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The significance of blood indicators in distinguishing bipolar disorder depressive episodes from major depression in teenagers.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: There is ongoing debate about the role of blood indicators in distinguishing between bipolar disorder depressive episodes (BD-D) and major depressive disorder (MDD) in teenagers. This study aimed to assess the role of blood indicator in distinguishing BD-D from MDD in teenagers and identify potential biomarkers. Methods: We collected clinical data of BD-D and MDD teenagers from January 2022 to January 2025. To mitigate the effects of possible confounding variables, we performed the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. After conducting univariate analysis, we performed logistic regression analysis, and ROC curve analysis on blood indicators, then nomogram prediction model was constructed using R language software. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in each group after PSM analysis. While many blood indicator were associated with by univariate analysis, logistic regression analysis identified the lymphocyte-to-HDL ratio (LHR, p<0.0001) and platelet-to-HDL ratio (PHR, p<0.0001) as predictors for BD-D. ROC curve analysis further revealed 1.3307 and 108.3806 as the critical values for separating BD-D from MDD in teenagers. Subsequently, we established nomogram-based prediction model and obtained an AUC of 0.7097 with the calibration curve showing strong consistency and decision curve analysis indicating substantial clinical utility. Conclusions: Our investigation revealed that LHR and PHR levels were correlated with BD-D and could be considered as potential biomarkers, which was confirmed by the nomogram prediction model. We also determined their threshold values to distinguish BD-D from MDD in teenagers. We should recognize that these results still necessitate further clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.