Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Adaptation and validation of the generative AI dependency scale: evidence from construct validity, reliability and measurement invariance.

Demet Alkan, Erdem Boduroğlu, Mahmut Sami Yıgıter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Demet AlkanDepartment of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, Hacettepe University, Ministry of National Education, Ankara, Türkiye.
Erdem BoduroğluDepartment of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, Ereğli Faculty of Education, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye.
Mahmut Sami YıgıterDistance Education Application and Research Center, Social Sciences University of Ankara, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Generative AI Dependency Scale into Turkish and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample. The study was conducted with 640 participants. The adaptation process was carried out through translation, back-translation, expert review and cultural evaluation procedures. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and both first-order and second-order models were tested. The findings supported the original three-factor structure of the scale, consisting of cognitive preoccupation, negative consequences, and withdrawal. The fit indices indicated that both models demonstrated good fit. Reliability analyses showed that the Turkish form of the scale had acceptable to high internal consistency coefficients for both the subdimensions and the total score. Additional evidence based on the measurement model was obtained through average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) values. Measurement invariance analyses further showed that the scale achieved strict invariance across all examined demographic and AI-related groups. Overall, the findings provide evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Generative AI Dependency Scale for assessing dependency on generative artificial intelligence systems.

Indexed as

generative AI dependencygenerative artificial intelligencemeasurement invariancereliabilityscale adaptationvalidity

Identifiers

PMID42626213
PMCPMC13491653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.