ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026
Impact of different anesthetic agents (propofol, etomidate, ketamine) on seizure duration and cognitive recovery in electroconvulsive therapy.
Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is also an ideal treatment alternative when dealing with treatment-resistant depression, together with other severe mental conditions. Localization of seizures and cognitive effects of anesthetic agents is significantly influenced by the anesthetic used, but an optimal anesthetic method/regime remains debatable.
aimTo identify comparative consequences of propofol, etomidate, and ketamine regarding the length of seizures and post-ECT cognition.
methodsThe current study involved a methodical search of the literature, based on PRISMA guidelines, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational research studies that evaluate the difference between anesthetics used during ECT. The articles analyzed pertained to seizure durations, cognitive performance, hemodynamic factors, and recovery. The quality evaluation was done on the applicable tools of RCT and observational research. Interpretation of the statistical data, based on IBM SPSS, was conducted with the assistance of qualitative synthesis.
resultsThere were 24 articles taken into account, 11 RCTs and 13 observational studies identified. Several studies have revealed that etomidate is more effective in reducing seizure duration than propofol in various patient groups. Ketamine also recorded increased efficacy in antidepressant but inconsistent activity in the length of seizures. Propofol was linked with shorter recovery times, although the reduction of seizures was constant and shorter each time. The reviews revealed a significant disparity in cognitive outcomes among the agents, with etomidate exhibiting better cognitive profiles than propofol in several trials.
conclusionThe available evidence in the existing literature suggests that etomidate may be beneficial in terms of seizure duration and could yield satisfactory cognitive outcomes. Ketamine shows signs of greater treatment efficacy, but its application must be carefully evaluated in regard to dosage plans. The effectiveness of seizure control can be influenced by this predictive anesthesia that accompanies the rapid recovery of activities following propofol administration. The choice of anesthetic agent should be individualized, based on the nature of the patient and the motive behind the treatment, as well as institutional policy. Large-scale RCT is needed to provide evidence-based recommendations that may be taken decisively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.