ReviewWorld journal of methodology2026
Doctor of osteopathic medicine degree still faces recognition challenges in the United States: Suggested ways to improve awareness.
Review in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately one-quarter of United States medical students train at osteopathic medical schools, which confer the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) degree upon graduation. That number has risen exponentially over the past several years, with the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine reporting a 65.7% increase in total enrollment since 2013. This increase is at least partly due to the opening of more DO-granting medical schools. However, despite the growing number of osteopathic physicians entering the United States workforce, the degree remains under recognized by patients, nurses, and ancillary staff within hospital systems across the country. Surprisingly, a portion of DO physicians themselves contribute to this under recognition through degree misrepresentation with the Doctor of Medicine label. These physicians have also been historically marginalized from certain competitive specialties and leadership positions, which play a role in under recognition. We suggest proper degree identification and the promotion of more DOs into leadership roles to ultimately improve awareness. Some perceptual challenges and specific barriers to career advancement persist, particularly in competitive specialties, and the continued under recognition despite more osteopathic physicians than ever in the workforce may further perpetuate biases that limit opportunities for prominent leadership roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.