ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Developing a wellbeing framework for employees working from home within a South African government entity.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally transformed work arrangements, accelerating the shift to remote work and reshaping employee wellbeing. While working from home (WFH) offered flexibility and autonomy, it also introduced challenges such as social isolation, anxiety, and reduced engagement. Guided by contextual psychology, which emphasizes the dynamic interaction between individuals and their environments, this study examines employee wellbeing in a public sector context and aims to develop a context-sensitive wellbeing framework. A qualitative, hermeneutic phenomenological design was employed within a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine employees from a South African government entity who transitioned to WFH. Data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Contextual psychology informed the interpretation by emphasizing how organizational, social, and personal conditions shape wellbeing. Trustworthiness was ensured through established qualitative rigor strategies. A central theme of "recommended approaches" emerged, comprising five subthemes: happiness, flexibility, clear employee engagement, training and development, and constant support. Findings indicate that wellbeing is context-dependent and influenced by organizational practices, technological readiness, and social connection. Hybrid work enhanced happiness through social interaction and positive emotions; flexibility promoted autonomy; engagement reduced role ambiguity; training improved competence; and support strengthened resilience. These dimensions informed the development of an integrated working from home wellbeing framework (WFHWB).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.