ArticleHealth science reports2026
Comparison of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms Between Quay and Rubber-Tyred Gantry Crane Operators: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms Between Quay and Rubber-Tyred Gantry Crane Operators: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a major global occupational health concern. Port crane operators are particularly susceptible due to the extremely awkward postures required at their workstations; however, comprehensive data on this specific population remain limited. This research aimed to investigate and compare the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) problems and perceived discomfort among operators of quay and rubber-tired gantry (RTG) cranes at the Laem Chabang Deep-Sea Port in Thailand. Methods: A modified, standardized version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), incorporating a Borg rating scale, was administered to 26 male crane operators (11 quay and 15 RTG). An a priori power analysis using G*Power confirmed that a minimum sample size of 24 was sufficient for hypothesis testing. Results: The NMQ revealed the lower back as the most commonly affected body part (76.9%), followed by the neck, shoulders, and upper back (each at 23.1%) across all port crane operators. Overall, 96.2% of participants reported MSK problems over the past 12 months. Borg scale ratings for perceived discomfort also showed the highest score for the lower back (2.38), followed by the upper back (0.65), shoulders (0.54), and neck (0.50). Notably, when comparing MSK prevalence (χ2 test) and perceived discomfort levels (Kruskal-Wallis test) across nine body regions between the two groups, a significant difference was found in the upper back; quay crane operators reported significantly more problems than RTG operators ( Conclusion: Factors such as awkward working postures, mental stress, working at height, trolley distance, and vibration are potential key contributors to these MSK issues. The significant difference in upper back problems suggests that quay crane operators face a greater magnitude of exposure to ergonomic hazards than RTG operators. Targeted interventions, particularly the implementation of engineering controls at workstations, are crucial to mitigate these occupational risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.