ReviewCureus2026
The Pediatric Anesthesia Parent Satisfaction (PAPS) Questionnaire: A Focused Review of its Development, Validation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Clinical Utility.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction has become a central metric in evaluating healthcare quality. However, its use in pediatric anesthesia is less explored due to unique challenges in reporting satisfaction by a pediatric surgical patient. As a result of this, parental satisfaction is utilized as a validated proxy. To fill the gap of not having a validated tool for parent satisfaction, the Pediatric Anesthesia Parent Satisfaction (PAPS) questionnaire was developed, based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Practice Management recommended questions. The tool was developed following a rigorous, expert, and parent-informed development process. This focused review attempts to summarize the available literature on the PAPS questionnaire, covering its development, psychometric validation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinical application. Four articles meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The original 17-item instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha above 0.7) and a three-factor structure involving physical symptoms, communication, and professionalism, with a pronounced ceiling effect. Two translations achieved excellent psychometric performance (Cronbach's alpha 0.937 and 0.96, respectively), confirming the instrument's cross-cultural robustness. Clinical application revealed consistently high satisfaction in high-income settings (more than 95%), with lower satisfaction observed only in one study (77.7%). The reasons for higher satisfaction were non-anxious parental status, male sex, urban residence, employment, and sedative premedication. Across all settings, postoperative symptom management and parental preparation for induction and emergence emerged as consistent areas for improvement. We conclude that PAPS is a globally applicable, psychometrically effective tool with considerable scope for improvement for continuous quality improvement in pediatric anesthesia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.